Culture-based Negotiation Styles


People in different cultures negotiate differently. The make different assumptions about the nature of their conflict, and about the appropriate way of dealing with it. If disputants do not understand and adjust to these differences, further difficulties are likely to ensue. Project participants discuss how disputants and intermediaries can avoid such problems.


Determining Culturally-Appropriate Negotiation Strategies


Peter Woodrow discusses how to design dispute resolution systems that are culturally appropriate.

Kevin Avruch discusses two major types of errors peace practitioners make when trying to be sensitive to culture.

Kevin Avruch talks about ways intervenors can raise their cultural competency.

Marcia Caton Campbell advises that mediators should not overlook disputants' own approaches to conflict resolution.

What should an outsider consider about local culture before intervening? Scholar-practitioner Wallace Warfield explains the debate between the basic human needs approach versus the cultural anthropological view.

Paul Wehr talks about the importance of "multi-modal," culturally-appropriate interventions.


Case Examples


Peter Woodrow discusses his work designing a dispute resolution system for East Timor land tenure conflicts.

Peter Woodrow describes a Sri Lankan approach to mediation.
This rough transcript provides a text alternative to audio. We apologize for occasional errors and unintelligible sections (which are marked with ???).


Beyond Intractability Version II
Copyright © 2003-2006 The Beyond Intractability Project
Beyond Intractability is a Registered Trademark of the University of Colorado
Project Acknowledgements

The Beyond Intractability Knowledge Base Project
Guy Burgess and Heidi Burgess, Co-Directors and Editors
c/o Conflict Research Consortium, University of Colorado
Campus Box 580, Boulder, CO 80309
Phone: (303)492-1635; Fax: (303)492-2154; Contact