 |
 |
|
Introduction:
Morton Deutsch continues his discussion of what makes people be competitive or cooperative, and describes the results of those choices.
| |
This rough transcript provides a text alternative to audio. We apologize for occasional errors and unintelligible sections (which are marked with ???).
Managing Conflict
Morton Deutsch
E.L. Thorndike Professor and Director Emeritus of the International Center for Cooperation and Conflict Resolution at Teachers College, Columbia University
| |
 |
The next item is what people will be.
Whether they will be cooperative, or constructive in managing the conflict
versus competitive or destructive in managing the conflict. And the students and
I were all engaged in a lot of the experiments. And out of that series of
experiments came out another important but simple idea, which I have summarized
in what I call "Deutsch's Crude Law of Social Relations." It concludes
that the typical effects of a given relation tend to induce that relationship.
The typical effects of a cooperative relation can be found where you talk openly
and honestly, where communication is open and honest in full, where there is
friendly trusting relationships, where you try to enhance the other's powers and
resources and where you manage conflicts in a cooperative way. Those typical
effects induce a cooperative orientation to a conflict and lead to constructive
management of a conflict.
On the other hand, the typical effects of a
competitive orientation are found where there's a win-lose struggle,
communication tends to break down, you tend to get suspicious of the other, you
tend to want to enhance the power differences between yourself and the other, so
that you have much greater power than the other, and you want to win in a
conflict. Those typical effects lead to a destructive conflict process. That was
published in 1973, a long time ago, thirty years ago, in my book, The Resolution
of Conflict: Constructive and Destructive Processes. And that book became a very
important, sort of classic in the field.
|
 |
 |
 |