 |
 |
Howard Gadlin - Workplace Mediation
|
Introduction:
Howard Gadlin, Ombudsman at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) describes his work in providing workplace mediation. It involves a reactive element of dealing with disputes, but also identifying common institutional problems that can be corrected.
| |
mediation
This rough transcript provides a text alternative to audio. We apologize for occasional errors and unintelligible sections (which are marked with ???).
Workplace Mediation
Howard Gadlin
Ombudsman, Center for Cooperative Resolution, National Institutes of Health
| |
I am the ombudsman at MIH. There are two major parts of that work. One
is working with particular disputes when they come up. They might be disputes
between two individuals or disputes in a whole group -- a laboratory, a branch
of an office, a division, an entire institute
And in many of the disputes that I work with in my
position are disputes among scientists, they could be about authorship, the
sharing of biological materials, the direction of a scientific collaboration,
the functioning of a laboratory or whatever. The office also deals with more
ordinary work place disputes, not necessarily just scientists. There are five of
us here that work with cases, but my caseload is very heavily scientific these
days. People who come to us for a variety of different ways of working with some
thing.
Sometimes someone will come in simply to have coaching on how to handle a
situation in a less adversarial way than they might do it on their own. At other
times they are asking for more direct intervention on our part, and we then
tailor an intervention to their particular circumstance with their history of
the issues and the people and whatever it might be. We may use a sort of
traditional mediation, at some points we do. We might actually
create some hybrid intervention that is partly mediation and partly facilitating
a whole group meeting. We sometimes work with groups who bring us a problem that
gets re-interpreted as
. I am not saying this clearly.
Often times, people think that problems they are having in the workplace
involve personal differences and conflicts between people. When we look
carefully at the conflicts that they have and the conditions in which they occur
it appears that there are systemic factors that are supporting the conflict.
People are in conflict in part because of the way in which there work and
communication is organized in sort of self-contradictory ways, so we sometimes
work with a group to sort of re-engineer its whole work process and take
attention away from the individual disputes and try to understand the structural
dynamics that are sustaining it. Sometimes we have to work at both levels at the
same time. That is the one part of our job.
The other part of our job is recognizing patterns and problems within the
organizations, such as procedures, practices, that are leading to the generation
of conflicts -- unhappiness, grievances, and complaints -- and making
recommendations for changes in practices, policies, or procedures that would
keep such conflicts from occurring. We do a lot of preventative, or prophylactic
kind of work as well, trying to engage people. For example, at the beginning of
scientific collaborations having partnering agreements where they spell out in
specific detail what they expect of one another and they build in a mechanism
for dispute resolution, rather than waiting for conflicts of that sort to arise.
We have modeled that process after what the only core of engineers developed for developing partnering agreements in the construction industry
but ours is tailored towards scientific collaboration.
|
 |
 |
 |