 |
 |
|
Introduction:
Mark Gerzon, organizer of the Congressional civility retreats, talks
about the dialogue that took place during a retreat for Representatives of the U.S. Congress. He suggests that the recognition of shared pain allowed parties to see one another
as real human beings.
| |
This rough transcript provides a text alternative to audio. We apologize for occasional errors and unintelligible sections (which are marked with ???).
Dialogue within the US House of Representatives
Mark Gerzon
Private facilitator, Mediator, Trainer, Author and key organizer of the Congressional Civility Retreats
| |
Q: How did you structure the process of the retreat?
A: The first thing I did, unlike the other people they interviewed to do
this, was I went and listened to them. I said "Why do you need
somebody?". Everybody else came in and made their pitch and I didn't. I
came in and said, "You have a very talented staff, a very talented group of
people, why do you need to hire anybody from the outside?"
Q: Even though you had an opinion
A: I had my opinion but I said, "Could each of you", there were
about eight Congress people sitting at the table, "Take thirty seconds and
just say why you're looking for somebody from the outside?" They each spoke for thirty seconds. Then I made my
whole pitch based on what they just said. They said it far more eloquently than
I. Like one of them, an old Democrat from Texas said, " Well, hell, we're
in this fix because we don't know how to fix it, if there were somebody here who
knew how to fix it, we wouldn't in the fix for the first place, so we need to go
outside otherwise we're just going to repeat what we've just done". He said
it with just a really kind of country drawl, just said it.
and then it was very easy for me to say, "Well my approach would be
not
to build it around an outside facilitation team, but to train a group of you to
do the retreat, to work together, to run the retreat yourself. So that when
we're all done, you will have been trained and you won't be going back and
saying "Well, the facilitators were great or facilitators were lousy",
because you will have been the facilitators and you will develop a capacity in
the House that will stay in the house floor, there even when we leave."
I was very conscious that I was being hired on the outside for a period of
time and my job ended. But their jobs continued, their staff's jobs continued.
And they liked that approach.
|
 |
 |
 |