 |
 |
|
Introduction:
Can institutional dynamics contribute to stereotypes? Mark Gerzon, organizer of
the Congressional civility retreats, suggests that part of what determines the way parties
treat each other is the institutional structure in which personal relationships are created.
On his view, the U.S. House of Representatives is plagued by divisive stereotypes and enemy
images.
| |
This rough transcript provides a text alternative to audio. We apologize for occasional errors and unintelligible sections (which are marked with ???).
Us versus Them
Mark Gerzon
Private facilitator, Mediator, Trainer, Author and key organizer of the Congressional Civility Retreats
| |
A: I had never personally witnessed the way in which
a system, which is malfunctioning, can work into your behavior and that really
fine people could behave in ways that were toxic. That was a very important
experience for me because it helped me understand how very decent people could
be part of a Nazi 3rd Reich, or how very decent people could be apart of a
program against the Jews or how very decent people could witness the
annihilation of the American Indians or very decent people could be apart of the
lynching of blacks. If not actual instigators of it, they could certainly be
witnesses to it and party to it and tolerate it and accept it and that they were
not evil people. They were apart of systems that were evil. That
was a very important learning experience for me.
Q: Wow, so you really saw behavior dictated by the system in which they
operated in?
A: If every person who's born, was labeled A or B and the As could put the
Bs out of work and the As could distort and malign the Bs and the Bs could lie
about them publicly on television. Basically, to overstate it, if the As could
destroy the Bs or the Bs could destroy the As, that's a system, that's going to
powerfully affect the way that As and Bs think, the way they populate and raise
their children, go to school, go to church, synagogue. That's going to affect
everything in their lives because an "us and them" has been created
that is going to change forever how we see the whole. It is going to change how they see the world,
for better or for worse.
You go into the House, there's a Democratic cloakroom and a Republican
cloakroom. There's a Democratic side and a Republican side and a Democratic
funding structure and a Republican funding structure. I actually had images of
the segregation of the south, where it said "White Entrance" and "Black Entrance" except here it was a Democratic entrance and
Republican entrance. You start your political life, and what are you, are you a
Democrat or a Republican? Basically, you've got to label yourself. You've got to
stick with a Democrat or a Republican on your forehead. So we're having this
interview on the table about the Iraq war, and Democratic and Republican didn't
matter so much because Democrat and Republican was trumped by another "us
and them", by another A and B, it was trumped by American and Iraqi.
And so, suddenly, all these differences, and there were all these
guys walking in lockstep.
A: I was startled by the fact that this quality
of relationship was at the heart of one of the most powerful institutions of the
most powerful country in the world. It shocked me that when the stakes were so
high, that the quality of the relationship could be so low.
I had this notion that when the stakes got high, the relationships got better
because the stakes were so high, but I found out that wasn't true. Major, major,
multi-billion dollar things and major issues were often shaped by personal
animosities and failure to communicate and hostility and revenge from what
people had done previous times. An enormous amount of what I witnessed there was
about revenge about what they had done the previous time. So you would ask
Republicans why they would trash the majority, they would say, "Well when
they were in the majority, they did that to us and now we're going to do that to
them. Of course, they want to change it now, they want to be civil now, they're
in the minority". But it was revenge, "Well, when they ran the House
system, they would shortchange us with seats so.."
Q: Hold up nominations in committee?
A: Yeah, so now we're going to do the same thing, it's our turn. And sure,
nobody's getting physically hurt, physically annihilate or any of that, but it's
the same basic emotional structure that happens in the Holocaust and the
genocides. It's now the Tutus chance to get the Hutus, it's the Serbs' chance to
get the Bosnians. And then if the tide shifts, its now our turn to get them and
the whole system is structured that way. I noticed that everybody's either
majority or minority, they don't know how to have partnerships, that's one of the major things I built into the retreat. So that a room
was being managed by a Democrat and a Republican working as a pair and the
success of the room depended upon the success of the partnership. It's a very
different model from, "I'm the majority and you're the minority. I'm the
majority chair of this committee and you're the minority". That's a
top-down hierarchial relationship, there's no such thing as a relationship of equals there.
|
 |
 |
 |